post

Psychology of Belief Part 5: Compliance Techniques



Which is more likely? That missionaries generate converts through the power of holy inspiration? Or that missionaries are really clever marketers?

EDIT: Ray’s method here is probably more than just a foot-in-the-door effect. You will also notice a few “door-in-the-face” questions as well. These are designed to elicit an immediate rejection, followed by a lesser concession. See reference #4 at the end for an experimental demonstration of this effect.

Psychological Manipulation:
“Foot in the Door” Persuasion Technique:
“Door in the Face” Persuasion Technique:

TheraminTrees’ on conformity:

References:

Freedman, J.L. and Fraser, S.C. “Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, Vol.4, No. 2, 155-202

Cialdani, R.B., Basset, R., Cacioppo,, J.T., and Miller, J.A., “Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: commitment then cost,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, Vol. 36, No. 5, 463-476

Burger, J.M., “Increasing compliance by improving the deal: the that’s-not-all technique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, Vol.51 No. 2, 277-283

Cialdani, R.B., Vincent, J.E., Lewis, S.K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., and Darby, B.L., “Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: the door-in-the-face technique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, Vol. 31, No. 2, 206-215

Kassin, S. Fein, S., Markus, H.R., “Social Psychology,” Ed 7, Houghton Mifflin, 2008

Psychology of Belief Playlist:

This video series was created and reuploaded with permission of AntiCitizenX. Check out his channel for more great videos!

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.

#Psychology #Belief #Part #Compliance #Techniques

Some Toughts (16)

  1. Avatar
    added on 5 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Religious leaders don't want to deliver a message, they only want control. Of course it's effective if they have a big stick (hell) and a big carrot (immortality). But both promises are imaginary.

  2. Avatar
    added on 5 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    I really like the narration in the later videos because I mostly listen while I am doing other things. Again, great series!

  3. Avatar
    added on 5 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    A watermelon doesn't fit very well in our hands, therefore WE'RE ALL ALIENS AND THAT'S PROOF OMG OMG. Haha that banana thing was so dumb.

  4. Avatar
    added on 6 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Billy Mays at 6:20

    But wait, there's more! If you subscribe now, you'll also get to see Ray Comfort at 7:11

  5. Avatar
    added on 7 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Lmao at the endless rows of apple laptops…

  6. Avatar
    added on 7 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    the accusation of murder is a "Thought Crime" plain an simple..

  7. Avatar
    added on 7 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Text book manipulation 🙂

  8. Avatar
    added on 12 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    I use this technique at work, since i actually do statistical surveys on the phone with people.. it's really a lot simpler to do even than portrayed here 🙂

    I can boil it down to this:
    I call you, you pick up saying "hello, this is (your name)"
    i say "hello, i am (my name) from (statistical institute name), is this (phone number)?"

    you say "yes"

    There you go, my foot is in your door, and you are now roughly 20-30~ percent more likely to accept an interview of up to 10 minutes 🙂

  9. Avatar
    added on 12 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Now, mind you i dont use this technique to trick people into doing something they really don't want to do. Honestly, if that was what i was doing i would do it in telemarketing instead and earn a lot bigger salary.

    No, rather i'm creating a more accepting and consenting atmosphere, and you as the responder can still decline, and when you decline i'll try to ask if it's just because i called at an inconvenient time, and when this is also answered by yes, we arrange to do it later instead 🙂

  10. Avatar
    added on 16 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    Good point, but i that case if you murder just once you are not murderer 🙂

    However I think these names like all professions are temporary if you steal something you are thief for some time. just like with all jobs. if you join police you do not become policeman for life but only when you are at work

    so if you are accused being liar or thief you should respond that you "were" but you are not like that now.

  11. Avatar
    added on 17 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    In that case we should make 2 definitions like "thief in heart" , and plain thief.
    If I am going to murder someone when it will be possible I am murderer in heart, but only when i do that in reality I become murderer.

    Christianity seems to forgive your actions but condemn your desires. It is better if I actually killed someone and don't want to kill anymore than if I have desire to kill but not killed anyone yet.
    I think that idea is quite good.

  12. Avatar
    added on 24 Apr, 2012
    Reply

    dammit i woulda fell for the thats not all technique, yea im a big sucka

  13. Avatar
    added on 29 Jun, 2012
    Reply

    It doesn't make you a murdered to hate someone, but it does put you in a similar psychological state as a murderer. Namely the anger part. What feelings you have about the hatred may very well also be similar to a murderer. It depends largely on what feelings come w/ hatred.

  14. Avatar
    added on 21 Sep, 2012
    Reply

    this series is very informative, a real treasure of explanative resources. And hearing your voice makes it better.

  15. Avatar
    added on 10 May, 2015
    Reply

    Your videos are very insightful. They deserve far more views.

  16. Avatar
    added on 11 Sep, 2018
    Reply

    Wooow, I wouldn't know which error to begin with. The gist of this video is that having a solid set of morals and ethics is considered text book phycological manipulation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.